Quick answer: Veterinarians are notably more stress-exposed than most Australian occupations — ranked #34 of 317 by workplace mental health hazard exposure, with a composite stress score of 55/100 against a national average of 47.4. The biggest drivers are responsibility burden and physical environment.
Veterinarians stress profile vs the national average
Each occupation is scored across six categories of workplace mental health hazard, built from 22 stress factors identified in SafeWork Australia's occupational hazards data. Higher scores mean greater exposure.
- Emotional demands47.4 vs 37.9 avg
- Responsibility burden82.3 vs 60 avg
- Pace and demands63.2 vs 56 avg
- Lack of control11.9 vs 24.5 avg
- Precision and monotony71.5 vs 67.7 avg
- Physical environment53.4 vs 38.2 avg
Scores range 0–100; higher = more stress-inducing. Source: SafeWork Australia Beta Occupational Hazards Dataset.
What drives the score for veterinarians
Compared with the average Australian occupation, veterinarians score furthest above the norm on responsibility burden (82.3 vs 60 average), physical environment (53.4 vs 38.2 average) and emotional demands (47.4 vs 37.9 average). The single biggest individual stress factor is frequency of decision making at 94.5/100 — against an all-occupation average of 70.7.
The occupation scores below the national average for lack of control (11.9 vs 24.5), which moderates the overall ranking.
See how this compares across all 317 Australian occupations, ranked by stress score.
The biggest stress factors for veterinarians
- 1Pace and demands
Frequency of Decision Making
94.5/100
All-occupation average: 70.7
- 2Responsibility burden
Impact of Decisions on Co-workers or Company Results
88.8/100
All-occupation average: 70.4
- 3Precision and monotony
Importance of Being Exact or Accurate
88.8/100
All-occupation average: 78.6
- 4Responsibility burden
Coordinate or Lead Others
88.5/100
All-occupation average: 64.9
- 5Physical environment
Physical Proximity
85.8/100
All-occupation average: 61.1
All 22 stress factors for veterinarians
The complete scorecard: every stress factor measured for this occupation, grouped into the six categories, with the all-occupation average alongside.
Emotional demands
47.4 vs 37.9 avg- Deal With Physically Aggressive People12.2 vs 14
- Deal With Unpleasant or Angry People65.2 vs 50.4
- Frequency of Conflict Situations64.8 vs 49.3
Responsibility burden
82.3 vs 60 avg- Responsibility for Outcomes and Results77.2 vs 58.5
- Responsible for Others' Health and Safety80 vs 57.3
- Impact of Decisions on Co-workers or Company Results88.8 vs 70.4
- Consequence of Error77.2 vs 49
- Coordinate or Lead Others88.5 vs 64.9
Pace and demands
63.2 vs 56 avg- Time Pressure80.2 vs 71.6
- Duration of Typical Work Week68.5 vs 62.1
- Pace Determined by Speed of Equipment16 vs 23.1
- Frequency of Decision Making94.5 vs 70.7
- Level of Competition56.8 vs 52.4
Lack of control
11.9 vs 24.5 avg- Lack of Autonomy to Make Decisions6 vs 23.6
- Amount of Highly Structured Work17.8 vs 25.3
Precision and monotony
71.5 vs 67.7 avg- Importance of Repeating Same Tasks54.2 vs 56.9
- Importance of Being Exact or Accurate88.8 vs 78.6
Physical environment
53.4 vs 38.2 avg- Sounds and Noise Levels Are Distracting or Uncomfortable71 vs 52.3
- Extremely Bright or Inadequate Lighting17.8 vs 24.9
- Very Hot or Cold Temperatures12.2 vs 32.4
- Exposed to Disease or Infections80.2 vs 20.2
- Physical Proximity85.8 vs 61.1
Understand these hazards
The elevated stress categories for veterinarians map to recognised psychosocial work factors under ISO 45003 and Australian WHS legislation. Learn what each one is and how it can be controlled:
- Exposure to Violence →Whether workers face the risk of physical or verbal aggression at work.
- Exposure to Trauma →Whether workers encounter traumatic events or material as part of their role.
- Work Interaction →The quality of relationships and interactions within the team and organisation.
- Work Demands →The volume, pace, and complexity of what is asked of workers.
- Role Clarity →Whether workers clearly understand what is expected of them.
- Leadership →The quality and consistency of management behaviour at all levels.
Methodology
Clearhead scored 317 occupations in the Australian and New Zealand Standard Classification of Occupations (ANZSCO) using SafeWork Australia's Beta Occupational Hazards Dataset. We kept only the 22 hazard variables relating to mental health — such as conflict exposure, decision-making pressure, and time pressure — and deliberately excluded physical safety risks like working at height.
The 22 variables are grouped into six categories: emotional demands, responsibility burden, pace and demands, lack of control, precision and monotony, and physical environment. An occupation's composite score is the equally weighted average of its six category scores. All scores run 0–100, where higher means more stress-inducing.
Two control-related variables are reported by SafeWork with inverted polarity (“freedom to make decisions” and “structured versus unstructured work”). We reverse these and present them as lack of autonomy to make decisions and amount of highly structured work, so that a higher score consistently indicates greater stress exposure.
Hazard exposure describes the average conditions of an occupation, not any individual's experience — everyone has a different tolerance for these challenges, and conditions vary between workplaces.
Frequently asked questions
Veterinarians: how stressful is the job?
Veterinarians rank #34 out of 317 Australian occupations for workplace mental health hazards, with a composite stress score of 55/100 against a national average of 47.4. That makes the occupation more stress-exposed than 89.3% of Australian jobs.
What are the biggest mental health stress factors for veterinarians?
The highest-scoring hazards are frequency of decision making (94.5/100), impact of decisions on co-workers or company results (88.8/100) and importance of being exact or accurate (88.8/100). Overall, the occupation scores above the national average in emotional demands, responsibility burden, pace and demands, precision and monotony and physical environment.
Which stress factors are lower for veterinarians?
Veterinarians score below the national average for lack of control (11.9 vs 24.5 average), which partially offsets the higher-scoring hazards.
Where does this data come from?
Scores are derived from SafeWork Australia's Beta Occupational Hazards Dataset. Clearhead filtered the dataset to the 22 mental-health-related hazard variables — excluding physical safety risks — and scored 317 ANZSCO occupations across six categories: emotional demands, responsibility burden, pace and demands, lack of control, precision and monotony, and physical environment.
Beyond the average
This is the average hazard exposure for veterinarians. Your workforce isn't average.
Clearhead's Psychosocial Risk Pulse measures the actual psychosocial risk in your organisation, quarterly — across 18 ISO 45003-aligned work factors.